festgasil.blogg.se

Cogs analysis
Cogs analysis





There was mutual agreement of preference in various parameters: Anterior cranial base (Ptm-N), Lower anterior face height (Ans-Gn), Upper posterior face height (PNS-N) which was statistically significant. Majority of Oral and maxillofacial surgeons marked skeletal parameter as important while Orthodontist marked soft tissue as important. Results: Percentage wise preference was determined for various parameters. The forms were collected and the data was tested statistically. A preferential form consisting of all the parameters of COGS analysis with three preference for each parameter-1): Important, 2): Slightly important and 3): Not so important, were distributed to both the specialists. The selection was done randomly by selecting the specialist through online list. Materials and Methods : 20 Oral surgeons and Orthodontist with 2 years of experience were selected for this study. So this study was done to determine the parameters of preference for an Oral surgeon and Orthodontist respectively. While performing this analysis it becomes very cumbersome for an oral surgeon and orthodontist to discuss the case with all the parameters in mind. This analysis consists of 37 parameters under 7 subheading which covers cranial, skeletal, dental, facial parameters. Introduction: Cephalometric analysis for Ortho-Gnathic Surgery (COGS) is the most commonly used analysis for diagnosing and treatment planning of an orthognathic case. Variable’s of COGS analysis for Orthognathic surgery based on preferences of two specialists- A perspective based studyĪuthor Details : Parveen Akhtar Lone *, Faisal Arshad, Jasbinder Kumar, Sabiha Parwaiz







Cogs analysis